CASE  NO.: CR  90/2011

IN  THE  HIGH  COURT  OF  NAMIBIA

In the matter between:

THE  STATE

versus

ATTIE  MUVANGUA  &  PAULUS  SHISHIVENI

[HIGH  COURT  REVIEW  CASE  NO.:  1858/2011]

CORAM:    PARKER, J  et  SIBOLEKA, J

Delivered on:  2011  SEPTEMBER  30
________________________________________________________________________

REVIEW  JUDGMENT

SIBOLEKA, J.:

[1]	The two accused appeared before the Magistrate’s Court at Okahandja on a charge of theft.

[2]	They were questioned in terms of section 112(1)(b) contrary to the request by the Prosecutor that the matter be disposed in terms of section 112(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Act 51/77.  I have no good reason to fault the learned Magistrate’s conduct.  I must just mention here that the questioning in terms of section 112(1)(b) must be done in respect of each accused separately, and that such questions and answers must be so recorded up to the end, then comes the other accused, until they have all been accorded the opportunity to tell the Court what happened.  This is the proper cause the learned Magistrate should have adopted here.  Despite this shortcoming I am satisfied that the two accused had indeed intended to plead guilty, and were thus correctly convicted.

[3]	However, after the conviction the learned Magistrate imposed the following sentence:
“Each:  N$1,000.00 (one thousand Namibian dollars) of which N$500.00 (five hundred dollars) is suspended for a period of two (2) years on conditions accused is not convicted of theft or attempted theft committed during the period of suspension
Or
Six (6) months imprisonment of which three (3) months is suspended for a period of two (2) years on condition that the accused is not convicted of theft or attempted committed during the period of suspension.”

[4]	It has been stated in numerous review matters by this Court that a suspended sentence must be clearly framed to enable the accused to understand what he is not supposed to do in future.  The manner in which the above sentence has been written is confusing and cannot be allowed to stand.

[5]	In the result I make the following order:
The conviction is confirmed;
The sentence imposed by the learned Magistrate is set aside and substituted with the following:
Each:  N$1,000.00 (one thousand Namibian Dollars) or six (6) months imprisonment of which N$500.00 or three (3) months are suspended for two years on condition that the accused is not convicted of theft, committed during the period of suspension.

___________________
SIBOLEKA, J

I  agree.

______________________
PARKER, J