CASE NO.: CR 19/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA
In the matter between:
THE STATE
and
MAPWAYA ALSON

REVIEW JUDGMENT

[2]      I addressed the following query to the Magistrate:

"Is S 56(d) applicable in respect of Namibian citizens? No question was asked, or admission made by the accused, to the effect that he is a citizen of another country. Has all the elements of the charge been proved?
[3] In reply the Magistrate responded as follows:

"I concede, I erred by failing to canvass the element as to the citizenship of the accused. This is an oversight on my part which is sincerely regretted. This means that an important essential element was not proved. I therefore place the record before the learned judge for the necessary remedial action be taken."

[5] The conviction has to be set aside. However, because it is not practical to refer the matter back tot he Magistrate to properly question the accused in terms of S 112(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act no. 51 of 1977, the same order is made as in that case.

[6]      In the result the following order is made:
1.	The conviction and sentence of the accused is set aside.
If the accused paid the fine imposed, it should be refunded to him.

MULLER, J

I agree

HOFF, J