3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA, MAIN DIVISION, WINDHOEK
RULING
Case Title: GREYHORSE MINING SAUL TAREE KAHUIKA v MAERUA MALL (PTY) LTD | Case No: HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH-2021/04060 | |
Division of Court: HIGH COURT(MAIN DIVISION) | ||
Heard before: Honourable Lady Justice Prinsloo | Date of hearing: 31 October 2022 | |
Date of order: 11 November 2022 | ||
Neutral citation: Greyhorse Mining v Maerua Mall (Pty) Ltd (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH-2021/04060) [2022] NAHCMD 613 (11 November 2022) | ||
Results on merits: As set out below. | ||
The order: 1. The Applicants / Defendants are hereby granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Namibia against the orders made on 24 August 2022; 2. No order as to costs. Further conduct of the matter: 3. The case is postponed to 9 March 2023 at 15:00 for Status hearing. 4. Joint status report must be filed on or before 6 March 2023. | ||
Reasons for orders: | ||
PRINSLOO J: Background
‘1. The exceptions in respect of the special plea and the first claim are upheld with costs. Such costs to include the costs of one instructing and one instructed counsel. 2. The defendant's special plea and the plea in respect of claim 1 is struck. 3. The defendants may amend their pleadings as set out in paragraph 1, within 20 days from date of judgment, if so advised. 4. The matter is postponed until 6 October 2022 at 15h00 for a status hearing.’ [2] The applicants (defendants in the main action) seek leave to appeal to the Supreme court against the judgement and the orders, including costs, made on 24 August 2022. [3] The application for leave to appeal is not opposed by the respondent herein. The applicable law and application thereof [4] The threshold enquiry in an application for leave to appeal was set out by our Supreme Court in Knouwds NO (In his capacity as Provisional Liquidator of Avid Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Josea and Another1 as follows: ‘Generally speaking, the attributes to constitute an appealable judgment or order are threefold, namely, the decisions must be final, be definitive of the rights of parties or must have the effect of disposing of at least a substantial portion of the relief claimed in the main proceeding. In terms of s 18(3) of the High Court Act interlocutory orders are not appealable as of right and need the leave of that court or, if that was refused, the leave of the Chief Justice, given by him on petition to be able to come on appeal.’
| ||
Judge’s signature | Note to the parties: | |
Prinsloo Judge | Not applicable. | |
Counsel: | ||
Applicant | Respondent | |
L Murorua of Murorua Kurtz Kasper Incorporated Windhoek | K Morland of Lubbe & Saaiman Incorporated Windhoek |
1 Knouwds NO (In his capacity as Provisional Liquidator of Avid Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Josea and Another 2010 (2) NR 754 (SC) para 10.