- Flynote
-
Extinctive prescription – s 12(3) of Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – involves two enquiries in respect of facts from which the debt arises (primary facts) – first: determination of primary facts – second: ascertainment of when primary facts were known or should reasonably have been known.
Loading PDF...
This document is 149.1 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 7
Judgment 5
- Links v Member of the Executive Council, Department of Health, Northern Cape Province [2016] ZACC 10 (30 March 2016)
- Loni v Member of the Executive Council, Department of Health, Eastern Cape, Bhisho [2018] ZACC 2 (22 February 2018)
- Minister of Finance and Others v Gore NO (230/2006) [2006] ZASCA 98 (8 September 2006)
- Mtokonya v Minister of Police [2017] ZACC 33 (19 September 2017)
- Truter and Another v Deysel (43/2005) [2006] ZASCA 16 (17 March 2006)
Legislation 2
Documents citing this one 7
Judgment 7
- Johannes G Coetzee & Seun and Another v Le Roux and Another (969 of 2020) [2022] ZASCA 47 (8 April 2022)
- Le Roux and Another v Johannes G Coetzee & Seuns and Another (CCT 117/22) [2023] ZACC 46 (18 December 2023)
- MEC for Health v Gamede (CA05/2022) [2022] ZAECMHC 39 (29 November 2022)
- Makhoba v Standard Bank of South Africa (845/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 213 (9 November 2023)
- Member of Executive Council for Health Eastern Cape v N H obo A (513/2021) [2022] ZASCA 181 (15 December 2022)
- Member of the Executive Council For Health Eastern Cape v Diko (CA1/2023) [2023] ZAECBHC 29 (15 September 2023)
- Shackleton Credit Management CC v Standard Bank SA Ltd and Others; In Re: Adams v Shackleton Credit Management CC and Others (54103/2012) [2023] ZAGPPHC 158 (17 March 2023)